<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only Sith Deal in Absolutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=91" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91</link>
	<description>Ex-Pro Football Player turned Stay At Home Mom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:22:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paris hotel rooms</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-65649</link>
		<dc:creator>paris hotel rooms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-65649</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts.<br />
You have a great Blog!!! I just added you to my Google News Reader.<br />
Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</p>
<p>Next month I will go to Paris on Vacations and visit Europe for the first time.<br />
Itīs my first adventure!!! I will update my blog soon!</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Technology</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-65634</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-65634</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. Were did you got all the information from... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Were did you got all the information from&#8230; <img src='http://girlsonthegridiron.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-65617</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-65617</guid>
		<description>God help us from Christians analyzing a movie largely based upon Buddhist thought and archetypes.  Go watch Narnia.  I am sure you will like that better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God help us from Christians analyzing a movie largely based upon Buddhist thought and archetypes.  Go watch Narnia.  I am sure you will like that better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EM@SJ.CA.USA</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-65613</link>
		<dc:creator>EM@SJ.CA.USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-65613</guid>
		<description>Not only was the statement out of character, it was weak, out of place, and it was a self-accusation. 
&quot;ONLY a Sith deals in absolutes&quot;
Really? I was wondering where all the mathematicians went.
Why not simply:
&quot;You&#039;re talking like a Sith, Anakin!&quot; or
&quot;Only Sith make enemies out of friends.&quot;
It&#039;s because Lucas was obsessed with making political statements rather than with writing a good screenplay. It was yet another jab at Bush and his association with religious right &quot;absolutists&quot;. The irony is that the heroes of Lucas&#039; story are religious absolutists.
What Lucas really wanted to say was &quot;Only you, Bush, and the Christian right deal in absolutes and blood-for-oil, and you all want to subject the whole universe to your capitalist moralist empire, which is why I&#039;d really love to cut your arms and legs off and let the whole world watch you catch on fire and nearly burn to death so that you can go on living in seething agony till we can let you know that your wife is dead and we&#039;ve kidnapped and brainwashed your two children and taught them to hate you and attack you. Ha, ha, ha, ha!&quot;
Luckily, George ultimately recognized this as a run-on sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only was the statement out of character, it was weak, out of place, and it was a self-accusation.<br />
&#8220;ONLY a Sith deals in absolutes&#8221;<br />
Really? I was wondering where all the mathematicians went.<br />
Why not simply:<br />
&#8220;You&#8217;re talking like a Sith, Anakin!&#8221; or<br />
&#8220;Only Sith make enemies out of friends.&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s because Lucas was obsessed with making political statements rather than with writing a good screenplay. It was yet another jab at Bush and his association with religious right &#8220;absolutists&#8221;. The irony is that the heroes of Lucas&#8217; story are religious absolutists.<br />
What Lucas really wanted to say was &#8220;Only you, Bush, and the Christian right deal in absolutes and blood-for-oil, and you all want to subject the whole universe to your capitalist moralist empire, which is why I&#8217;d really love to cut your arms and legs off and let the whole world watch you catch on fire and nearly burn to death so that you can go on living in seething agony till we can let you know that your wife is dead and we&#8217;ve kidnapped and brainwashed your two children and taught them to hate you and attack you. Ha, ha, ha, ha!&#8221;<br />
Luckily, George ultimately recognized this as a run-on sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Leviathan,

Excellent point. I&#039;m going to go for Obi being a rhetorical dunce, because I don&#039;t think he gave his dialogue the level of analysis you have....Or his plot.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leviathan,</p>
<p>Excellent point. I&#8217;m going to go for Obi being a rhetorical dunce, because I don&#8217;t think he gave his dialogue the level of analysis you have&#8230;.Or his plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Patti,

I agree. Current culture is a tad bit scary. I don&#039;t have the faith that popular media is in the business of causing the current generation to think, create, feel or read.....

I also blame the people eating it up though....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patti,</p>
<p>I agree. Current culture is a tad bit scary. I don&#8217;t have the faith that popular media is in the business of causing the current generation to think, create, feel or read&#8230;..</p>
<p>I also blame the people eating it up though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leviathan</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Leviathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 09:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-710</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that no one I&#039;ve seen has caught the irony of the inherent contradictory property of the statement &quot;Only Sith deal in absolutes&quot;. It condemns absolutes at the very moment it proclaims to be one. &quot;ONLY Sith deal in absolutes&quot; ONLY being the key word here. Now I&#039;m not sure if Lucas is all that smart if he has a key protagonist unwitingly placing himself in the camp of those he&#039;s condemning. Almost like a friend I had who would jest with others with the ironic hypocritical exclamation &quot;You ALWAYS generalize.&quot; Lucas is placing Ol&#039; Ben as an interglactic rhetorical equivalant George W. Bush, condeming, unwittingly, himself in a narrow ignorant and rash statement that ricochets faster than light bounces off a reflective surface. In all the vast preperations the man made to make sure the CGI was rendered perfectly he sure didn&#039;t think much about fool proofing his political commentary when he decided to take a few delayed jabs at the conservative legacy from Nixon to &#039;W&#039;. But then Hollywood&#039;s never been too hot about having intellectual political dialog. Of course why should they when demagagory is ohhh so much easier, especialy when you have the emotional string tugging power of profesional performers and special effects artists trained in the very deepest science of knee-jerk emotional/hormonal appeals rather than any thing on an intellectualy engaging/rational level.

So Lucas. Is that statement &quot;Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suuufering!&quot; by old Yoda not as solid an indicator as Yoda states it to be? Is Obi a rhetorical dunce or is HE a Sith Lord too? I mean with all his absolutism in that statement about ONLY the sith thinking in absolutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that no one I&#8217;ve seen has caught the irony of the inherent contradictory property of the statement &#8220;Only Sith deal in absolutes&#8221;. It condemns absolutes at the very moment it proclaims to be one. &#8220;ONLY Sith deal in absolutes&#8221; ONLY being the key word here. Now I&#8217;m not sure if Lucas is all that smart if he has a key protagonist unwitingly placing himself in the camp of those he&#8217;s condemning. Almost like a friend I had who would jest with others with the ironic hypocritical exclamation &#8220;You ALWAYS generalize.&#8221; Lucas is placing Ol&#8217; Ben as an interglactic rhetorical equivalant George W. Bush, condeming, unwittingly, himself in a narrow ignorant and rash statement that ricochets faster than light bounces off a reflective surface. In all the vast preperations the man made to make sure the CGI was rendered perfectly he sure didn&#8217;t think much about fool proofing his political commentary when he decided to take a few delayed jabs at the conservative legacy from Nixon to &#8216;W&#8217;. But then Hollywood&#8217;s never been too hot about having intellectual political dialog. Of course why should they when demagagory is ohhh so much easier, especialy when you have the emotional string tugging power of profesional performers and special effects artists trained in the very deepest science of knee-jerk emotional/hormonal appeals rather than any thing on an intellectualy engaging/rational level.</p>
<p>So Lucas. Is that statement &#8220;Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suuufering!&#8221; by old Yoda not as solid an indicator as Yoda states it to be? Is Obi a rhetorical dunce or is HE a Sith Lord too? I mean with all his absolutism in that statement about ONLY the sith thinking in absolutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti</title>
		<link>http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 14:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlsonthegridiron.com/?p=91#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Reading the article, the thing I found sort of chilling, is the ending.  The article describes Hollywood studio executives demanding that other upcoming films be scrubbed of any potentially political messages.

Who needs censors, when our corporate sponsors are censoring themselves so rigorously?

What value is any form of storytelling if it refuses to address the most interesting and challenging issues of its time?  If we can&#039;t explore our divisions even in fiction, how will we ever resolve them?

I am really frightened by the corporate dumbing down of our music, movies, news, and literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the article, the thing I found sort of chilling, is the ending.  The article describes Hollywood studio executives demanding that other upcoming films be scrubbed of any potentially political messages.</p>
<p>Who needs censors, when our corporate sponsors are censoring themselves so rigorously?</p>
<p>What value is any form of storytelling if it refuses to address the most interesting and challenging issues of its time?  If we can&#8217;t explore our divisions even in fiction, how will we ever resolve them?</p>
<p>I am really frightened by the corporate dumbing down of our music, movies, news, and literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
